<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (4) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110399</link>
    <description>Alternative statutory remedy does not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge concerns the legality and jurisdiction of action under a recent statute requiring interpretation. Security interests in agricultural land fall outside the Act; therefore, interim relief cannot be conditioned on an onerous deposit that may effectively defeat the claimed exemption and impair property rights. A tribunal should preserve the asset through restrictions on alienation, encumbrance or alteration while determining its agricultural character. The conditional stay was set aside, with the agricultural-land issue left for determination in the pending appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:57:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147415" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (4) TMI 313 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110399</link>
      <description>Alternative statutory remedy does not absolutely bar writ jurisdiction under Article 226 where the challenge concerns the legality and jurisdiction of action under a recent statute requiring interpretation. Security interests in agricultural land fall outside the Act; therefore, interim relief cannot be conditioned on an onerous deposit that may effectively defeat the claimed exemption and impair property rights. A tribunal should preserve the asset through restrictions on alienation, encumbrance or alteration while determining its agricultural character. The conditional stay was set aside, with the agricultural-land issue left for determination in the pending appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>