https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110387 The court upheld the legality of the order for investigation under the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing that the Registrar of Companies (RoC) can form an opinion without seeking additional information. It ruled that the RoC's discretion in preparing a report is not subject to primary judicial review and that the investigation is a fact-finding exercise that does not affect the rights of the petitioner company. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the investigation order was valid and not arbitrary, highlighting the Act's aim to protect investors and ensure proper management of company affairs. en-us Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:38:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110387 The court upheld the legality of the order for investigation under the Companies Act, 1956, emphasizing that the Registrar of Companies (RoC) can form an opinion without seeking additional information. It ruled that the RoC's discretion in preparing a report is not subject to primary judicial review and that the investigation is a fact-finding exercise that does not affect the rights of the petitioner company. The court dismissed the petition, stating that the investigation order was valid and not arbitrary, highlighting the Act's aim to protect investors and ensure proper management of company affairs. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 21 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110387