<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 543 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110386</link>
    <description>Company Court conditions permitting a secured creditor to remain outside liquidation proceedings are mandatory and bind the creditor because the Court retains custody and control of the company&#039;s assets after winding up. The conditions protect workmen, creditors and the liquidation estate by ensuring supervised sale and the best obtainable price. Failure to file a valuer&#039;s report before sale is a serious breach but does not automatically void the auction. The Company Court retains discretion to refuse confirmation where the liquidation interests warrant it, including where valuation indicates that a fresh sale may obtain a higher price. The refusal to confirm the sale was upheld and the appeals failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:31:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147402" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 543 - HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110386</link>
      <description>Company Court conditions permitting a secured creditor to remain outside liquidation proceedings are mandatory and bind the creditor because the Court retains custody and control of the company&#039;s assets after winding up. The conditions protect workmen, creditors and the liquidation estate by ensuring supervised sale and the best obtainable price. Failure to file a valuer&#039;s report before sale is a serious breach but does not automatically void the auction. The Company Court retains discretion to refuse confirmation where the liquidation interests warrant it, including where valuation indicates that a fresh sale may obtain a higher price. The refusal to confirm the sale was upheld and the appeals failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>