<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (2) TMI 539 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110377</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company under the Companies Act, 1956, as the claim for refund of expired/damaged medicines did not fall within the winding-up jurisdiction. The court highlighted that the petitioner&#039;s failure to pursue a civil suit and the discrepancies in the claims indicated an attempt to avoid paying court fees. Therefore, the court found that the relief sought by the petitioner could not be granted through the winding-up process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:04:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (2) TMI 539 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110377</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the company under the Companies Act, 1956, as the claim for refund of expired/damaged medicines did not fall within the winding-up jurisdiction. The court highlighted that the petitioner&#039;s failure to pursue a civil suit and the discrepancies in the claims indicated an attempt to avoid paying court fees. Therefore, the court found that the relief sought by the petitioner could not be granted through the winding-up process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110377</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>