https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110362 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai was filed by the Commissioner challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the liability to confiscation of imported marbles but reducing the fine for redemption. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and finding that the department's appeal seeking to enhance the penalty could not be entertained after the previous order had been passed on merits. The decision on liability to confiscation but reducing the fine for redemption was upheld. en-us Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:34:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110362 The appeal before the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai was filed by the Commissioner challenging the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) confirming the liability to confiscation of imported marbles but reducing the fine for redemption. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal by the Commissioner, upholding the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and finding that the department's appeal seeking to enhance the penalty could not be entertained after the previous order had been passed on merits. The decision on liability to confiscation but reducing the fine for redemption was upheld. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110362