https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110358 The court held that the order dated 29-1-2004 was not enforceable under section 634A as it required additional consent terms. It also affirmed the Company Law Board's jurisdiction limitations under section 10E, stating it does not extend to private firms, trusts, and family properties without consent from all affected parties. The appeals challenging the Company Law Board's orders were dismissed, upholding the legality and validity of the Board's decisions. en-us Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Apr 2012 13:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110358 The court held that the order dated 29-1-2004 was not enforceable under section 634A as it required additional consent terms. It also affirmed the Company Law Board's jurisdiction limitations under section 10E, stating it does not extend to private firms, trusts, and family properties without consent from all affected parties. The appeals challenging the Company Law Board's orders were dismissed, upholding the legality and validity of the Board's decisions. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 28 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110358