https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110338 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, directing the Official Liquidator to re-fix the pay scale to include the increments the applicant would have received if not for the suspension. The court emphasized that denying the applicant his regular increments would be unjust, as there was no departmental inquiry or punishment imposed. The court held that employees cannot be deprived of benefits without due process, and reinstated employees should be treated as continuously employed. Consequently, the court made the petition absolute, granting the applicant the entitlement to all increments granted to other employees in similar positions during the suspension period. en-us Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:26:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110338 The court ruled in favor of the applicant, directing the Official Liquidator to re-fix the pay scale to include the increments the applicant would have received if not for the suspension. The court emphasized that denying the applicant his regular increments would be unjust, as there was no departmental inquiry or punishment imposed. The court held that employees cannot be deprived of benefits without due process, and reinstated employees should be treated as continuously employed. Consequently, the court made the petition absolute, granting the applicant the entitlement to all increments granted to other employees in similar positions during the suspension period. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110338