<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 469 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110334</link>
    <description>The judge decided to condone the 12-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the Counsel&#039;s negligence, setting aside the dismissal order. The case was remanded for a hearing on merits, emphasizing the importance of not penalizing parties for procedural errors and ensuring the opportunity to present substantive arguments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:24:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 469 - CESTAT,  NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110334</link>
      <description>The judge decided to condone the 12-day delay in filing the appeal before the Commissioner (Appeals) due to the Counsel&#039;s negligence, setting aside the dismissal order. The case was remanded for a hearing on merits, emphasizing the importance of not penalizing parties for procedural errors and ensuring the opportunity to present substantive arguments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110334</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>