<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (1) TMI 408 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110329</link>
    <description>The court found that the respondent company was unable to pay its debts under the Companies Act, the winding-up petition was maintainable despite a pending civil suit, and the respondent&#039;s defence was not bona fide. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of the respondent company, directing the Official Liquidator to take control of its assets and instructing the directors to file statements within three weeks.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 13:16:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147345" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (1) TMI 408 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110329</link>
      <description>The court found that the respondent company was unable to pay its debts under the Companies Act, the winding-up petition was maintainable despite a pending civil suit, and the respondent&#039;s defence was not bona fide. Consequently, the court ordered the winding up of the respondent company, directing the Official Liquidator to take control of its assets and instructing the directors to file statements within three weeks.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110329</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>