https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110315 The Court allowed the applications, quashing the impugned notices and excusing the applicants from liability. The Court concluded that the applicants acted bona fide, and there was no deliberate intention to defraud the public. The delay in issuing the notices, the mistaken identity of the company as a vanishing company, and the inadequate consideration of the applicants' submissions by the Registrar of Companies were key factors in the judgment. en-us Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:47:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110315 The Court allowed the applications, quashing the impugned notices and excusing the applicants from liability. The Court concluded that the applicants acted bona fide, and there was no deliberate intention to defraud the public. The delay in issuing the notices, the mistaken identity of the company as a vanishing company, and the inadequate consideration of the applicants' submissions by the Registrar of Companies were key factors in the judgment. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110315