<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 398 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110311</link>
    <description>The court held that the provisions of section 108, except sub-section (1), of the Companies Act, 1956, are directory and not mandatory. It upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to direct the registration of the remaining pledged shares in the petitioner&#039;s name, dismissing the appeals as devoid of merits. The court emphasized the importance of substance over technical formalities and the prevention of perpetuating wrong actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:35:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 398 - HIGH COURT OF MADRAS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110311</link>
      <description>The court held that the provisions of section 108, except sub-section (1), of the Companies Act, 1956, are directory and not mandatory. It upheld the Company Law Board&#039;s decision to direct the registration of the remaining pledged shares in the petitioner&#039;s name, dismissing the appeals as devoid of merits. The court emphasized the importance of substance over technical formalities and the prevention of perpetuating wrong actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>