<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 605 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110309</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for a stay on the operation of its Order, emphasizing the long delay in implementation despite clear directives. The Tribunal noted that the filing of a Reference Application in the High Court did not warrant a stay and directed the Commissioner to comply with the Order within one month. Failure to do so would result in Contempt Proceedings. The Tribunal underscored the importance of timely compliance with its Orders to avoid legal consequences.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 12:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147325" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 605 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110309</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata rejected the Revenue&#039;s request for a stay on the operation of its Order, emphasizing the long delay in implementation despite clear directives. The Tribunal noted that the filing of a Reference Application in the High Court did not warrant a stay and directed the Commissioner to comply with the Order within one month. Failure to do so would result in Contempt Proceedings. The Tribunal underscored the importance of timely compliance with its Orders to avoid legal consequences.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110309</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>