<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110299</link>
    <description>The court directed the 2nd respondent to decide on the extension application within two months, vacating the interim stay order on the bank guarantee invocation. The lack of fraud allegations led to partial success for the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of timely decisions and responsiveness from authorities in matters related to export obligations under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:46:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147315" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 747 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110299</link>
      <description>The court directed the 2nd respondent to decide on the extension application within two months, vacating the interim stay order on the bank guarantee invocation. The lack of fraud allegations led to partial success for the petitioner, emphasizing the importance of timely decisions and responsiveness from authorities in matters related to export obligations under the Export Promotion Capital Goods Scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110299</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>