https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110298 Tenancy created after presentation of a winding up petition is vulnerable to being treated as a void transfer or act of insolvency and does not defeat the liquidator's statutory custody and control or his power to realize company assets; accordingly a post-petition tenant may not resist eviction by the Official Liquidator. Applications to review or recall earlier orders declaring otherwise were rejected because the tenancy arose post-petition and was not shown to be in the ordinary course of business. Offers by the tenant or low opportunistic bids were held unsuitable; possession must be delivered to the Official Liquidator for realization. en-us Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:48:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110298 Tenancy created after presentation of a winding up petition is vulnerable to being treated as a void transfer or act of insolvency and does not defeat the liquidator's statutory custody and control or his power to realize company assets; accordingly a post-petition tenant may not resist eviction by the Official Liquidator. Applications to review or recall earlier orders declaring otherwise were rejected because the tenancy arose post-petition and was not shown to be in the ordinary course of business. Offers by the tenant or low opportunistic bids were held unsuitable; possession must be delivered to the Official Liquidator for realization. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 16 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110298