<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 384 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110284</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company due to a bona fide dispute over the outstanding loan amount. The judge highlighted the partial repayment by the respondent-company and the settlement negotiations as indications of a genuine effort to resolve the debt matter. Consequently, the court concluded that the respondent-company&#039;s actions did not show an inability to pay its debts, leading to the rejection of the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 13:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147300" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 384 - HIGH COURT OF RAJASTHAN</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110284</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition for winding up the respondent-company due to a bona fide dispute over the outstanding loan amount. The judge highlighted the partial repayment by the respondent-company and the settlement negotiations as indications of a genuine effort to resolve the debt matter. Consequently, the court concluded that the respondent-company&#039;s actions did not show an inability to pay its debts, leading to the rejection of the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>