<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (12) TMI 382 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110281</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the respondent company raised genuine disputes over the outstanding amount and settlement terms. The court found no basis to admit the petition, emphasizing the importance of assessing bona fide disputes and evidence presented. The judgment highlighted a resolved dispute between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the winding-up petition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:03:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147297" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (12) TMI 382 - HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110281</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the winding-up petition under section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956, as the respondent company raised genuine disputes over the outstanding amount and settlement terms. The court found no basis to admit the petition, emphasizing the importance of assessing bona fide disputes and evidence presented. The judgment highlighted a resolved dispute between the parties, leading to the dismissal of the winding-up petition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110281</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>