<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 362 - CESTAT, mumbai</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110264</link>
    <description>An inkjet printing machine combined with a rewinding machine used to print mandatory particulars on soap wrappers qualified as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The machine printed date of packing, price and other compliance details required under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977, making the soap marketable only after such printing. A process that renders goods marketable and is incidental or ancillary to manufacture falls within manufacture for excise purposes, and the stage of the process is not decisive. Credit was therefore allowable and denial of credit was not sustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 10:13:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147280" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 362 - CESTAT, mumbai</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110264</link>
      <description>An inkjet printing machine combined with a rewinding machine used to print mandatory particulars on soap wrappers qualified as capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The machine printed date of packing, price and other compliance details required under the Standards of Weights and Measures Act, 1976 and the Packaged Commodity Rules, 1977, making the soap marketable only after such printing. A process that renders goods marketable and is incidental or ancillary to manufacture falls within manufacture for excise purposes, and the stage of the process is not decisive. Credit was therefore allowable and denial of credit was not sustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110264</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>