https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110261 The Court held jurisdiction to issue orders under Section 203(1)(b) pre-winding-up order. The petition was not dismissed due to non-compliance with notice requirements. Respondents breached fiduciary duty by increasing share capital without offering to existing members, aiming to control the company. Relying on legal precedents, the Court disqualified respondents as directors for two years and scheduled a hearing on company management. en-us Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:58:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110261 The Court held jurisdiction to issue orders under Section 203(1)(b) pre-winding-up order. The petition was not dismissed due to non-compliance with notice requirements. Respondents breached fiduciary duty by increasing share capital without offering to existing members, aiming to control the company. Relying on legal precedents, the Court disqualified respondents as directors for two years and scheduled a hearing on company management. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110261