https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110259 An amalgamation order under section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 dissolved the original company and allowed pending proceedings to continue only against the resulting company. In that setting, the claimant had to implead the transferee entities before obtaining a decree, because they were entitled to defend the suit. The general provisions in Order XXII rule 10 and section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not override the specific terms of the amalgamation order. A decree passed without impleading the Corporation and the State Government was therefore not executable against them, and the execution orders could not stand. en-us Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 11 Dec 2017 10:53:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110259 An amalgamation order under section 396 of the Companies Act, 1956 dissolved the original company and allowed pending proceedings to continue only against the resulting company. In that setting, the claimant had to implead the transferee entities before obtaining a decree, because they were entitled to defend the suit. The general provisions in Order XXII rule 10 and section 146 of the Code of Civil Procedure did not override the specific terms of the amalgamation order. A decree passed without impleading the Corporation and the State Government was therefore not executable against them, and the execution orders could not stand. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 05 Nov 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110259