<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 357 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110256</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the Customs House Agent&#039;s license was restricted until 31st December 2003 instead of the original date of 31-8-2004. The forfeiture of the security deposit was upheld, but the agent could resume operations from 1-1-2004 upon providing a new security deposit of Rs. 25,000. The decision aimed to balance the penalty imposed on the agent while considering the impact on their business and financial situation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:50:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 357 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110256</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the suspension of the Customs House Agent&#039;s license was restricted until 31st December 2003 instead of the original date of 31-8-2004. The forfeiture of the security deposit was upheld, but the agent could resume operations from 1-1-2004 upon providing a new security deposit of Rs. 25,000. The decision aimed to balance the penalty imposed on the agent while considering the impact on their business and financial situation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110256</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>