<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (10) TMI 347 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110242</link>
    <description>The Court upheld the Company Judge&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and directing the appellant to deposit the principal amount with interest. The appellant&#039;s defense was found to be dishonest and lacking credibility, with the Court deeming their conduct reprehensible and without merit. Failure to comply would result in publication of citations, indicating no discretion in favor of the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 13:15:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (10) TMI 347 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110242</link>
      <description>The Court upheld the Company Judge&#039;s decision, dismissing the appeal and directing the appellant to deposit the principal amount with interest. The appellant&#039;s defense was found to be dishonest and lacking credibility, with the Court deeming their conduct reprehensible and without merit. Failure to comply would result in publication of citations, indicating no discretion in favor of the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>