<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (12) TMI 345 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110233</link>
    <description>Declared import value cannot be rejected merely because a common director exists between the foreign supplier and the Indian marketing concern. In the absence of contemporaneous import evidence, proof of mutual interest, or material showing that the invoice price was not genuine, the department does not discharge the burden of proving undervaluation under the Customs Valuation Rules; the transaction value is therefore protected. Where undeclared goods are found in the consignment and the duty liability is sustained, the penalty may still be moderated if the original amount is excessive in relation to the proved liability, and it was reduced accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:51:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (12) TMI 345 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110233</link>
      <description>Declared import value cannot be rejected merely because a common director exists between the foreign supplier and the Indian marketing concern. In the absence of contemporaneous import evidence, proof of mutual interest, or material showing that the invoice price was not genuine, the department does not discharge the burden of proving undervaluation under the Customs Valuation Rules; the transaction value is therefore protected. Where undeclared goods are found in the consignment and the duty liability is sustained, the penalty may still be moderated if the original amount is excessive in relation to the proved liability, and it was reduced accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110233</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>