https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110223 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the respondent's right to demand payment for the difference in land cost following the company merger. The judgment emphasized upholding lease agreement clauses and honoring obligations arising from changes in property ownership due to amalgamation, despite court orders approving the merger. en-us Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:27:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110223 The court dismissed the writ petition, affirming the respondent's right to demand payment for the difference in land cost following the company merger. The judgment emphasized upholding lease agreement clauses and honoring obligations arising from changes in property ownership due to amalgamation, despite court orders approving the merger. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110223