<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110210</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside penalties imposed on the respondents in 12 appeals filed by Revenue. The judgment emphasized adjusting duty payments based on the duty already paid by the respondents and clarified the non-imposability of penalties, aligning with legal principles from a previous case. Interest would be payable by the respondents after adjusting duty paid on certain products, calculated on the differential amount of duty. The ruling provided a framework for addressing duty payments and interest calculations in excise matters, ensuring a fair resolution while balancing tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 12:10:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147226" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 394 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110210</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision to set aside penalties imposed on the respondents in 12 appeals filed by Revenue. The judgment emphasized adjusting duty payments based on the duty already paid by the respondents and clarified the non-imposability of penalties, aligning with legal principles from a previous case. Interest would be payable by the respondents after adjusting duty paid on certain products, calculated on the differential amount of duty. The ruling provided a framework for addressing duty payments and interest calculations in excise matters, ensuring a fair resolution while balancing tax liabilities and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>