<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2004 (9) TMI 394 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110197</link>
    <description>The court concluded that proceedings under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act are subject to Section 446 of the Companies Act, requiring leave from the High Court to proceed. Execution proceedings under Section 27 were transferred to the High Court, with the registry instructed to request records from District Consumer Forums in New Delhi and Ghaziabad. Applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:44:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2004 (9) TMI 394 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110197</link>
      <description>The court concluded that proceedings under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act are subject to Section 446 of the Companies Act, requiring leave from the High Court to proceed. Execution proceedings under Section 27 were transferred to the High Court, with the registry instructed to request records from District Consumer Forums in New Delhi and Ghaziabad. Applications were disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2004 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>