<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110196</link>
    <description>The Tribunal modified the Commissioner (Appeals) order, directing the recalibration of the differential duty considering any Modvat credit available to the appellants. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, ensuring the appellants&#039; entitlement to claim Modvat credit and adjusting the differential duty payable accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:41:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147212" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 385 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110196</link>
      <description>The Tribunal modified the Commissioner (Appeals) order, directing the recalibration of the differential duty considering any Modvat credit available to the appellants. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, ensuring the appellants&#039; entitlement to claim Modvat credit and adjusting the differential duty payable accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110196</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>