<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 461 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110186</link>
    <description>Composite equipment is classified by its principal function where separately identifiable components operate only as part of an integrated system. A colour monitor used with a thermal imager did not function independently and worked only to record and analyse temperature data within the same system. On that basis, the integrated thermal imager system was held to fall under Heading 9027.50, and separate classification of the monitor under Heading 8521.90 was not warranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147202" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 461 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110186</link>
      <description>Composite equipment is classified by its principal function where separately identifiable components operate only as part of an integrated system. A colour monitor used with a thermal imager did not function independently and worked only to record and analyse temperature data within the same system. On that basis, the integrated thermal imager system was held to fall under Heading 9027.50, and separate classification of the monitor under Heading 8521.90 was not warranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>