<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (10) TMI 280 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110175</link>
    <description>In company liquidation, a secured creditor&#039;s right to realise security under the State Financial Corporations Act is subject to the winding-up regime under the Companies Act. Sale and distribution cannot proceed independently of the company court or without associating the Official Liquidator, because the workmen&#039;s pari passu charge and overriding preferential treatment under sections 529 and 529A must be protected. Where the corporation has not invoked the statutory machinery under its Act, it cannot claim an unqualified preference over other creditors. A fresh valuation was also required before sale to ensure a fair price and proper protection of creditor and workmen interests.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 15:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147191" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (10) TMI 280 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110175</link>
      <description>In company liquidation, a secured creditor&#039;s right to realise security under the State Financial Corporations Act is subject to the winding-up regime under the Companies Act. Sale and distribution cannot proceed independently of the company court or without associating the Official Liquidator, because the workmen&#039;s pari passu charge and overriding preferential treatment under sections 529 and 529A must be protected. Where the corporation has not invoked the statutory machinery under its Act, it cannot claim an unqualified preference over other creditors. A fresh valuation was also required before sale to ensure a fair price and proper protection of creditor and workmen interests.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>