<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 602 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110162</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 2,41,35,655 under Sections 113(i) and (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the goods were correctly declared and there was no misdeclaration. The Tribunal also overturned the imposition of the redemption fine under Section 125 and the penalty under Section 114(iii), ruling in favor of the appellant on all three issues raised.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 10:10:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147178" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 602 - CESTAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110162</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the confiscation of goods valued at Rs. 2,41,35,655 under Sections 113(i) and (ii) of the Customs Act, 1962, as the goods were correctly declared and there was no misdeclaration. The Tribunal also overturned the imposition of the redemption fine under Section 125 and the penalty under Section 114(iii), ruling in favor of the appellant on all three issues raised.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>