<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110156</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the additional duty demand, confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellants in a case concerning the valuation of &#039;Sony&#039; and &#039;Pioneer&#039; brand goods imported from Dubai. The Tribunal held that the valuation should align with standard values adopted in Bombay Customs House, based on a circular from the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, which provided valuation norms for similar goods. The appellants&#039; argument that the confiscation and penalty were unwarranted as they had accurately declared the goods was accepted by the Tribunal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2012 09:59:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147172" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 384 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110156</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal by setting aside the additional duty demand, confiscation of goods, redemption fine, and penalty imposed on the appellants in a case concerning the valuation of &#039;Sony&#039; and &#039;Pioneer&#039; brand goods imported from Dubai. The Tribunal held that the valuation should align with standard values adopted in Bombay Customs House, based on a circular from the Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai, which provided valuation norms for similar goods. The appellants&#039; argument that the confiscation and penalty were unwarranted as they had accurately declared the goods was accepted by the Tribunal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>