https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110154 The Supreme Court upheld a detention order under the COFEPOSA Act despite the detenue's challenge based on the non-supply of documents relied upon by the detaining authority. The Court clarified that only essential documents forming the basis of preventive detention need to be provided to the detenue. In this case, as the detaining authority did not rely on the passport entries but on the detenue's statement about foreign visits, the failure to supply passport copies did not invalidate the detention order. The Court emphasized the detenue's right to effective representation while maintaining the legality of preventive detention procedures. en-us Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 05 Apr 2017 10:18:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110154 The Supreme Court upheld a detention order under the COFEPOSA Act despite the detenue's challenge based on the non-supply of documents relied upon by the detaining authority. The Court clarified that only essential documents forming the basis of preventive detention need to be provided to the detenue. In this case, as the detaining authority did not rely on the passport entries but on the detenue's statement about foreign visits, the failure to supply passport copies did not invalidate the detention order. The Court emphasized the detenue's right to effective representation while maintaining the legality of preventive detention procedures. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 24 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110154