https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110136 Amino Globin was held classifiable under Tariff Item 1B, not Tariff Item 14E, because comparable products and the same manufacturing process had already been treated that way in earlier Tribunal decisions. The same tariff treatment was therefore applied to maintain consistency in classification. The exemption claim under Notification No. 17/70, as amended, was left to be examined separately on remand, since it depended on factual scrutiny after the classification issue was settled. The matter was returned for fresh decision in accordance with law and natural justice. en-us Wed, 18 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:22:26 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110136 Amino Globin was held classifiable under Tariff Item 1B, not Tariff Item 14E, because comparable products and the same manufacturing process had already been treated that way in earlier Tribunal decisions. The same tariff treatment was therefore applied to maintain consistency in classification. The exemption claim under Notification No. 17/70, as amended, was left to be examined separately on remand, since it depended on factual scrutiny after the classification issue was settled. The matter was returned for fresh decision in accordance with law and natural justice. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 18 Mar 1992 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110136