https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110133 An interlocutory impleadment order under Order I Rule 10 CPC was left undisturbed in revision because the trial court had exercised discretion to permit the managing director to come on record. The dispute was treated as one involving internal company differences, and the revisional court declined to examine the merits of rival claims as to who should represent the company at that stage. The bona fides of the suit and whether it was instituted in the company's interest were held to be matters for determination at final trial, not in revision. The revision petition therefore failed. en-us Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:18:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110133 An interlocutory impleadment order under Order I Rule 10 CPC was left undisturbed in revision because the trial court had exercised discretion to permit the managing director to come on record. The dispute was treated as one involving internal company differences, and the revisional court declined to examine the merits of rival claims as to who should represent the company at that stage. The bona fides of the suit and whether it was instituted in the company's interest were held to be matters for determination at final trial, not in revision. The revision petition therefore failed. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Aug 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110133