<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 364 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110120</link>
    <description>The Court granted the petitions for the sanction of a Scheme of Arrangement involving Slump Sale and Amalgamation, despite objections raised by Auditors regarding financial aspects. The Court found the explanations provided satisfactory, upheld the commercial wisdom of the shareholders, and deemed the Scheme to be in the interest of the companies, their members, and creditors. The costs were quantified at Rs. 3,500 per petition to be paid to the Assistant Solicitor General.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:00:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147136" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 364 - HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110120</link>
      <description>The Court granted the petitions for the sanction of a Scheme of Arrangement involving Slump Sale and Amalgamation, despite objections raised by Auditors regarding financial aspects. The Court found the explanations provided satisfactory, upheld the commercial wisdom of the shareholders, and deemed the Scheme to be in the interest of the companies, their members, and creditors. The costs were quantified at Rs. 3,500 per petition to be paid to the Assistant Solicitor General.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110120</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>