https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110113 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, admitted the appeal by condoning a 77-day delay in filing against the order-in-appeal. The Tribunal considered the circumstances, including delayed delivery of the order due to the factory being closed, lack of communication with the Consultant who appeared before the Commissioner (Appeals), and prompt initiation of the appeal upon receipt of the order by the appellant's authorized personnel. Consequently, the Tribunal found a valid case for condonation of the delay, allowing the appeal and scheduling the stay application for a hearing on 5-1-2004. en-us Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:45:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110113 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, admitted the appeal by condoning a 77-day delay in filing against the order-in-appeal. The Tribunal considered the circumstances, including delayed delivery of the order due to the factory being closed, lack of communication with the Consultant who appeared before the Commissioner (Appeals), and prompt initiation of the appeal upon receipt of the order by the appellant's authorized personnel. Consequently, the Tribunal found a valid case for condonation of the delay, allowing the appeal and scheduling the stay application for a hearing on 5-1-2004. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 08 Dec 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110113