https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110100 Article 24 of the Articles of Association required office bearers and executive committee members to retire at each AGM while remaining eligible for re-election. A proposed amendment would have imposed a one-year gap after two consecutive years of service. As more than 75% of members present at the EGM rejected the proposal, retention of the existing provision prevailed. The proposed tenure restriction was not considered an effective remedy for alleged election-related mala fides, oppression, or mismanagement. Earlier interventions addressed membership disputes, election conduct, and management concerns; an interim Board was therefore unnecessary. Minority members could pursue remedies for continuing oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act. en-us Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 17:01:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110100 Article 24 of the Articles of Association required office bearers and executive committee members to retire at each AGM while remaining eligible for re-election. A proposed amendment would have imposed a one-year gap after two consecutive years of service. As more than 75% of members present at the EGM rejected the proposal, retention of the existing provision prevailed. The proposed tenure restriction was not considered an effective remedy for alleged election-related mala fides, oppression, or mismanagement. Earlier interventions addressed membership disputes, election conduct, and management concerns; an interim Board was therefore unnecessary. Minority members could pursue remedies for continuing oppression or mismanagement under the Companies Act. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 04 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110100