https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110085 The appellants disputed their liability to pay interest under Section 11AB of the Act, arguing no suppression of facts and timely notice issuance. The adjudicating authority found no intent to evade duty but held them liable for interest post-amendment, irrespective of fraud proof. Appellants were ordered to pay interest from the amendment date until duty payment, with the impugned order modified accordingly. en-us Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:38:01 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110085 The appellants disputed their liability to pay interest under Section 11AB of the Act, arguing no suppression of facts and timely notice issuance. The adjudicating authority found no intent to evade duty but held them liable for interest post-amendment, irrespective of fraud proof. Appellants were ordered to pay interest from the amendment date until duty payment, with the impugned order modified accordingly. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 10 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110085