https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110080 Interim protection against enforcement of a confiscation order can be granted to preserve the status quo where a fresh application is pending and interference with manufacturing activity is in issue. The Tribunal noted that the earlier High Court stay had expired and, to avoid disruption until the pending application was decided, invoked Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 as the basis for interim restraint. It therefore restrained the department from enforcing confiscation of the plant and machinery and from interfering with the appellants' manufacturing operations until final disposal of the application. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:36:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110080 Interim protection against enforcement of a confiscation order can be granted to preserve the status quo where a fresh application is pending and interference with manufacturing activity is in issue. The Tribunal noted that the earlier High Court stay had expired and, to avoid disruption until the pending application was decided, invoked Rule 41 of the CEGAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 as the basis for interim restraint. It therefore restrained the department from enforcing confiscation of the plant and machinery and from interfering with the appellants' manufacturing operations until final disposal of the application. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 07 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110080