<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110077</link>
    <description>Imported goods supported by fake purchase documents were treated as not lawfully acquired, and that factual finding justified confiscation. The appellate authority&#039;s decision to set aside confiscation was held unsustainable because once the importer&#039;s supporting documents were proved not genuine, the goods could not be regarded as licitly acquired. The departmental appeal succeeded, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and confiscation of the imported goods was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:30:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147093" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 366 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110077</link>
      <description>Imported goods supported by fake purchase documents were treated as not lawfully acquired, and that factual finding justified confiscation. The appellate authority&#039;s decision to set aside confiscation was held unsustainable because once the importer&#039;s supporting documents were proved not genuine, the goods could not be regarded as licitly acquired. The departmental appeal succeeded, the order-in-appeal was set aside, and confiscation of the imported goods was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>