<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 328 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110069</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the restructuring scheme approved by the majority of debenture holders, emphasizing corporate democracy principles and the Company Court&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 391 of the Companies Act. The court rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the validity of Clause 7.5 and the applicability of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, affirming the fairness and reasonableness of the scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147085" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 328 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110069</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the restructuring scheme approved by the majority of debenture holders, emphasizing corporate democracy principles and the Company Court&#039;s jurisdiction under Section 391 of the Companies Act. The court rejected the appellants&#039; arguments on the validity of Clause 7.5 and the applicability of Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, affirming the fairness and reasonableness of the scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110069</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>