<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110063</link>
    <description>Imported goods were valued on the revised reduced price agreed by the foreign supplier during transit, because the price change occurred before the goods reached India and was not a post-importation alteration. On those facts, the original agreed price did not govern assessable value for customs valuation. The revised price was therefore adopted, and the assessee succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:10:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147079" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 441 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110063</link>
      <description>Imported goods were valued on the revised reduced price agreed by the foreign supplier during transit, because the price change occurred before the goods reached India and was not a post-importation alteration. On those facts, the original agreed price did not govern assessable value for customs valuation. The revised price was therefore adopted, and the assessee succeeded on the valuation issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110063</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>