<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 438 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110058</link>
    <description>The appeal by M/s. Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd. was rejected as the refund application was not submitted in the proper form within the specified time limit, rendering the claim time-barred. The appellants waived their right to be heard in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 16:03:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147074" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 438 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110058</link>
      <description>The appeal by M/s. Hoechst Marion Roussel Ltd. was rejected as the refund application was not submitted in the proper form within the specified time limit, rendering the claim time-barred. The appellants waived their right to be heard in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110058</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>