https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110055 The court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the suit as the auditor's report, a part of the cause of action, was prepared within its jurisdiction. The decision to cancel all nominations by the Election Officer was deemed invalid as it did not align with the club rules. While filing a statutory declaration in Form DD-A was not required at the time of nomination, it was mandated immediately after election. The court found the auditor's report lacking proper procedure and directed the club to proceed with elections based on existing nominations, appointing a Special Officer to supervise the process and ensure compliance with rules. en-us Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:40:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110055 The court held that it had jurisdiction to entertain the suit as the auditor's report, a part of the cause of action, was prepared within its jurisdiction. The decision to cancel all nominations by the Election Officer was deemed invalid as it did not align with the club rules. While filing a statutory declaration in Form DD-A was not required at the time of nomination, it was mandated immediately after election. The court found the auditor's report lacking proper procedure and directed the club to proceed with elections based on existing nominations, appointing a Special Officer to supervise the process and ensure compliance with rules. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 29 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110055