<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (4) TMI 302 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110040</link>
    <description>The court found the respondent-company indebted to the petitioner for US $100,000, ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court admitted the petition for hearing, directing the respondent to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs with the Registrar General within six weeks. Failure to comply would allow the petitioner to proceed with publication of citations, with the appointment of a provisional liquidator deferred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 15:06:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (4) TMI 302 - HIGH COURT OF DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110040</link>
      <description>The court found the respondent-company indebted to the petitioner for US $100,000, ruling in favor of the petitioner. The court admitted the petition for hearing, directing the respondent to deposit Rs. 50 lakhs with the Registrar General within six weeks. Failure to comply would allow the petitioner to proceed with publication of citations, with the appointment of a provisional liquidator deferred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110040</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>