<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (10) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110033</link>
    <description>Failure to grant a proper personal hearing before passing an adjudication order can vitiate the proceedings where the matter remains pending for an extended period after the last effective hearing and no fresh hearing date or intimation is issued. On those facts, the opportunity of hearing was held to be deficient and the requirement of fair hearing to have been breached. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for re-adjudication after affording a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:41:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147049" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (10) TMI 420 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110033</link>
      <description>Failure to grant a proper personal hearing before passing an adjudication order can vitiate the proceedings where the matter remains pending for an extended period after the last effective hearing and no fresh hearing date or intimation is issued. On those facts, the opportunity of hearing was held to be deficient and the requirement of fair hearing to have been breached. The impugned order was set aside and the matter was remanded for re-adjudication after affording a reasonable opportunity of personal hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110033</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>