https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110032 A winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed because the record did not show documentary proof of compliance with the statutory admission and advertisement requirements, and the Court declined to rely on oral assertions of publication. The Court confined itself to non-compliance with the procedural preconditions and did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute. A request to initiate perjury proceedings against the company's director was also rejected because alleged falsity in the affidavits required evidence and trial, and the materials before the Court did not establish deliberate falsehood with intent to mislead the Court. en-us Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 14:51:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110032 A winding up petition under the Companies Act, 1956 was dismissed because the record did not show documentary proof of compliance with the statutory admission and advertisement requirements, and the Court declined to rely on oral assertions of publication. The Court confined itself to non-compliance with the procedural preconditions and did not examine the merits of the underlying dispute. A request to initiate perjury proceedings against the company's director was also rejected because alleged falsity in the affidavits required evidence and trial, and the materials before the Court did not establish deliberate falsehood with intent to mislead the Court. Case-Laws Companies Law Wed, 20 Apr 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110032