https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110021 Excise classification of veterinary products depended on how they were licensed, registered, packaged, and marketed in trade. The first group of goods was treated as Ayurvedic Veterinary Medicaments because they appeared in the drug licence, were covered by registration for such medicaments, and were advertised and sold as medicines; classification under Heading 3003.30 up to 22-7-1996 and Heading 3003.39 thereafter was upheld. CALMIN and VIMIN were treated as animal feed supplements under Heading 23.02 because they were not listed in the drug licence, were outside the registration certificate, and were described only as cattle feed supplements. The brand-name and related duty and penalty issues were remitted for fresh decision, while extended limitation was upheld. en-us Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:45:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110021 Excise classification of veterinary products depended on how they were licensed, registered, packaged, and marketed in trade. The first group of goods was treated as Ayurvedic Veterinary Medicaments because they appeared in the drug licence, were covered by registration for such medicaments, and were advertised and sold as medicines; classification under Heading 3003.30 up to 22-7-1996 and Heading 3003.39 thereafter was upheld. CALMIN and VIMIN were treated as animal feed supplements under Heading 23.02 because they were not listed in the drug licence, were outside the registration certificate, and were described only as cattle feed supplements. The brand-name and related duty and penalty issues were remitted for fresh decision, while extended limitation was upheld. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 29 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110021