<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 595 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110015</link>
    <description>An Import Export Pass Book used for import, together with the appellant&#039;s initial claim for clearance in its own name, supported liability for penalty and confiscation. The later denial of ownership and of having placed the order, raised only after investigation began, did not explain how the appellant&#039;s import facility had been used. The record further supported a contravention of the import policy, making the goods liable to confiscation. A separate proceeding in which another party was later allowed to seek clearance did not disturb the findings on the materials in this matter, and the penalty and confiscation were sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:39:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147031" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 595 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110015</link>
      <description>An Import Export Pass Book used for import, together with the appellant&#039;s initial claim for clearance in its own name, supported liability for penalty and confiscation. The later denial of ownership and of having placed the order, raised only after investigation began, did not explain how the appellant&#039;s import facility had been used. The record further supported a contravention of the import policy, making the goods liable to confiscation. A separate proceeding in which another party was later allowed to seek clearance did not disturb the findings on the materials in this matter, and the penalty and confiscation were sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110015</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>