https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110014 Appellate interference with an interlocutory order regulating sale proceedings under the Special Court Act was held unwarranted because the order did not affect substantive rights, the sale process was already near completion, and no prejudice was shown. The Court noted that the mechanism included safeguards such as valuation, public notice, competitive bidding opportunities, and scrutiny by the Special Court before confirmation of sale. On that basis, the Custodian was permitted to continue conducting the sale in accordance with the Special Court's directions. en-us Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 03 Jun 2014 10:44:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110014 Appellate interference with an interlocutory order regulating sale proceedings under the Special Court Act was held unwarranted because the order did not affect substantive rights, the sale process was already near completion, and no prejudice was shown. The Court noted that the mechanism included safeguards such as valuation, public notice, competitive bidding opportunities, and scrutiny by the Special Court before confirmation of sale. On that basis, the Custodian was permitted to continue conducting the sale in accordance with the Special Court's directions. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110014