<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 592 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110007</link>
    <description>Penalty on duty-paid waste and scrap generated at a job worker&#039;s factory was considered excessive because the duty liability had already been accepted and fully discharged. With only the quantum of penalty surviving, the explanation of bona fide belief was accepted as a mitigating factor, and the penalty was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 while the appeal was otherwise rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:26:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=147023" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 592 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110007</link>
      <description>Penalty on duty-paid waste and scrap generated at a job worker&#039;s factory was considered excessive because the duty liability had already been accepted and fully discharged. With only the quantum of penalty surviving, the explanation of bona fide belief was accepted as a mitigating factor, and the penalty was reduced from Rs. 10 lakhs to Rs. 50,000 while the appeal was otherwise rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=110007</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>